1994-11-30 - Re: premail 0.30

Header Data

From: Alex Strasheim <alex@omaha.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fcbb96443cad30af38c7b0b652d09e1c9e872a7999f5a317dae70df54f9286c7
Message ID: <199411300322.VAA01173@omaha.omaha.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 03:21:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Nov 94 19:21:09 PST

Raw message

From: Alex Strasheim <alex@omaha.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 94 19:21:09 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: premail 0.30
Message-ID: <199411300322.VAA01173@omaha.omaha.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I've also installed premail as /usr/lib/sendmail, and it works fine.  I 
haven't had any problems with it reading my ~/.premailrc file.

I was a little queasy about installing it as sendmail, but I'm very glad I
did.  It hasn't caused any problems at all, adds a lot of functionality,
and doesn't seem to extract too high of a penalty in terms of overhead. 

I'm not sure how sendmail forks for incoming mail, but my impression is
that the additional instance of sendmail is created without calling
premail.  If that's true, then premail installed as sendmail doesn't add
any overhead at all for incoming mail.  This was a big concern for me, 
because I don't have very much memory or processor power, but so far 
everything's been working great.

==
Alex Strasheim | finger astrashe@nyx.cs.du.edu
alex@omaha.com | for my PGP 2.6.1. public key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBLtvvxREpP7+baaPtAQFq5wQAzT295CbJIQXJU8chI4Cwm9rHGa4mbqNV
+geDhS02z/ttYjMIoXRh1066YmnSEB3/3uqQPL4K1w8SP3z7uYfQwDwKwbmRdoPa
p03ksQ8PEK/9dbRc05azjz4PFpMTqk4HDhyQnM3xRo34DPNbnfl4HUSMbccvdCEw
vS4Vip00zX0=
=+du+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread