From: Tony.Gurnick@nzdairy.co.nz (DNA)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 07dd38c46d369848fdc47d3413290b2ed49a84893c2e59452e3a33ede310c235
Message ID: <94120907194944@nzdairy.co.nz>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-08 18:20:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Dec 94 10:20:54 PST
From: Tony.Gurnick@nzdairy.co.nz (DNA)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 94 10:20:54 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Breaking the NSA
Message-ID: <94120907194944@nzdairy.co.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Frenchie wrote
>Tony.Gurnick@nzdairy.co.nz wrote:
>
>>Frenchie Wrote
>>
>> Not that easy. They would just crack the code and *another*
>> acronym based agency would come up with a different reason to
>> seize you and your computer. It would seem unrelated to anyone
>> but *you* since you would know what you did but would have no
>> way to prove that your original infraction is why you are doin'
>> time. Hope that makes some sense.
>>
>>Maybe. What if the only way to do this was illegal?
>
> Then you would have to hope you never do anything illegal. Then
> no (pick your acronym) agency would be able to easily trump up
> a charge that could be used as an infiltration technique to get
> to your system *legally*. If they want to bad enuff I'm sure
> breaking the law to catch you doing something would be arranged.
> Violating National Interests maybe?
>
Um, you would still know pgp/rsa/idea has been broken???
>> If it isn't something *really good* they probably wouldn't come after
>> you anyway.
>
>>Whats the definition of GOOD?
>
> PGP?...3xDES?....RC5?....plans for an A-Bomb with instructions for
> construction and location of available nuclear material?...pick one.
Yeah Thats pretty good
>> #3 I can agree with. I don't think that NSA would tip their hand
>> and let on to us that they can read our stuff. At least, not directly.
>
>>We may as well find out.
>
> Agreed, the problem is finding a way to be sure! A little
> misinformation has a habit of going a long way.
Huh?
>> One more thing. Don't you think that they subscribe to the Cypherpunk
>> list just to see this kind of logic?
>
>>Maybe, But isnt freedom of speech what this list is about and what your
>>constitution does!
>
>
> Be careful...not everyone here is a U.S. resident or citizen.
> At least I don't think so.
> But since I am I know how precariously balanced the definition
> of free specch is. The Supreme Court in cahoots with law
> enforcement and lawmakers could change things pretty quick!
> Throw in a handy list of names......u know the rest.
Well Im not one (a us cit i mean), but another way of putting what I said is
Its like some private company invents a cipher
and you break it
And they get pissed at you for doing it.
But you did them a favour really cause someone more unscrupulous than you wouldnt
have told them.
So the NSA should be glad, and encourage us to speak like this and I think we should
continue along this track!
Unless of course they wish to comment....?
> BTW....I ain't one of 'em, and I wouldn't tell if I was. :)
>>Prove it
>[I see my smiley was disregarded]
Sorry, I forgot my smile, I was quite busy yesterday and thought I could get a quick
reply in. I bolloxed that up! Heres two ))
>Proof you say!
>A classical dilemma:
> If I say I am (one of them) it implies gathering
> intelligence or a reason to sow suspicion even if I am not.
> Denial implies I am what I say I am not.
> So, even though I am not, it would be impossible to *convince*
> you of that. If I was I still couldn't produce *believable*
> evidence to support the statement.
> Take my advice: Don't Trust Nobody.
Thats a good one
>Is there a reason *you* don't sign your messages? Hehehe.... :)
Cause I forgot...busy...chicken!
T
Return to December 1994
Return to “Tony.Gurnick@nzdairy.co.nz (DNA)”
1994-12-08 (Thu, 8 Dec 94 10:20:54 PST) - Breaking the NSA - Tony.Gurnick@nzdairy.co.nz (DNA)