From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 23:37:47 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Thread That Wouldn't Die (Was: Re: McCoy is Right!)
Message-ID: <199412160742.CAA12589@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[Please don't cc: me on messages to the list. Thanks.]

Jim McCoy writes:
> Actually this "dump flamewar" has produced some good discussion regarding
> actual implementation issues. 

I beg to differ. If you think that was a good discussion, I'd hate to see what
you'd classify as a bad discussion. Crypto relevance was minimal, too.

> Everything that has happened with MIME will happen again when people try to 
> add cryptography to the structure of the net.  

It seems to me that people are *already* trying to add cryptography to the
structure of the net, and that would actually be worth discussing.

> Maybe there are some lessons to be learned here.

_Maybe_, but I don't think anyone's learning them.

- - -L. Futplex McCarthy

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1

iQCVAwUBLvFDrGf7YYibNzjpAQFjXgP/QrsprjIVwZvAmkx8GAySAiEn7/VLtbuL
HfvPXaEBvq1iDr5Jax7p95ctWA6Qjo4H13LkUJIHkoMK+Hh5ofO6bG1g2ZBKWz8b
oX/S90pPhDDDc4yt6DPQXeaz57yA3IYYhUQzWrh9dH/LtAC5agsyqcJTGTWWrQ1/
pO7d7VQhFnQ=
=uE/d
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLvFE0yoZzwIn1bdtAQFQKwF/ROSbeuwJYgPTq8WJz3FQLVR9PEA99bBF
xxz4ISjLTvZKPPX8OQo2vE6cYgt3mChU
=Ahuo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----