From: db@Tadpole.COM (Doug Barnes)
To: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Message Hash: 1a684c735fc48a8438c3420e0a7d775cc1bd2a79dcaeb7c7cf7fea0bc9f0d2c5
Message ID: <9412130628.AA14196@tadpole.tadpole.com>
Reply To: <199412130523.VAA01839@netcom4.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 06:29:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 22:29:06 PST
From: db@Tadpole.COM (Doug Barnes)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 22:29:06 PST
To: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Subject: Re: BofA+Netscape
In-Reply-To: <199412130523.VAA01839@netcom4.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9412130628.AA14196@tadpole.tadpole.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
James --
You seem to be reacting to a number of deliberate
hot-button items in the projected mythos of Netscape.
1) Do you really think that Internet standards are
set by "the big boys?" Get a grip. Windows _still_
doesn't include a TCP/IP stack, which much be
grafted on with some pain. Apple has done a better
job, but only recently started shipping machines
with it.
2) Internet standards are set by the participants in
the internet. They move much more quickly than any
other standards body I've had the (mis)fortune of
dealing with, the standards are open and freely available,
and free reference implementations are required.
I cannot think of a more favorable set of circumstances
for the "little guy."
3) NCOM, by not merely circumventing but COMPLETELY
IGNORING the Internet standards setting process and
adjunct development of reference implementations, has
set forth to reinvent the wheel, and badly at that.
4) This is completely incidental to the way they have
soiled the community nest for WWW development, which
contains not only the "big boys", who can probably
take this sort of thing on the chin without blinking,
but also a horde of other "little guys," many of whom
are even smaller than NCOM.
Doug [ who has never worked on anything "for the masses", unless
the users of AIX or Non-Stop UX are "the masses" ]
Return to December 1994
Return to “jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)”