1994-12-02 - Re: The thread that would not die. (Mandating signatures)
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: John.Schofield@sprawl.expressnet.org (John Schofield)
Message Hash: 234ad5e7c487111568f2a909a0b98844a434d8f31efc85b6bb4bec9eceb45aa1
Message ID: <9412021551.AA04657@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <c92_9412012244@expressnet.org>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-02 15:52:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 07:52:01 PST
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 07:52:01 PST
To: John.Schofield@sprawl.expressnet.org (John Schofield)
Subject: Re: The thread that would not die. (Mandating signatures)
In-Reply-To: <c92_9412012244@expressnet.org>
Message-ID: <9412021551.AA04657@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Schofield says:
> It is silly to talk of someone "owning" the list. The list is a
> community. The only possible owners are the people in the community. If we
> all left, Eric would still have control over the list--but the list would be
> worthless.
It is silly to talk of someone "owning" a restaurant. The restaurant
is a community. The only possible owners are the people in the
community. If the patrons all left, Chef Joey would still have control
over the restaurant -- but the restaurant would be worthless.
Thread
Return to December 1994
- Return to “John.Schofield@sprawl.expressnet.org (John Schofield)”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
- 1994-12-02 (Fri, 2 Dec 94 04:11:26 PST) - The thread that would not die. (Mandating signatures) - John.Schofield@sprawl.expressnet.org (John Schofield)
- 1994-12-02 (Fri, 2 Dec 94 07:52:01 PST) - Re: The thread that would not die. (Mandating signatures) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>