1994-12-03 - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 25cfe55cc0b46085e24f773a8c7c124687d65d8b8768bf89f6279d69be0bbb4a
Message ID: <v01510101ab0577cb01be@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-03 01:38:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 17:38:54 PST

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 17:38:54 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta
Message-ID: <v01510101ab0577cb01be@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


PAP wrote:
>I just want, in a short message, let you know that there exist some
>satisfied ecash testers (the system itself and the support when we
>set-up our digishop and our plain customers cyberwallets).
>  The only thing I could eventually complain about is that I even received
>a second (unsollicited) account Id and password to retrieve ecash
>software because of a bug in the requests management :-)

I have been a beta tester since the days of the very first Ecash clients
which would freeze my computer when run ;-)

I am very impressed with the latest clients. They work flawlessly. The only
thing missing is off-line transfer capability. Since the current beta has a
(dimmed) button for this, I don't think we will have to wait much longer.


-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread