1994-12-05 - Re: Well now that we’re signing…

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: skaplin@skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Message Hash: 272b629b2f6f7e6469885201b6d70fe72dc823a022009b9dec36a8324abdf78b
Message ID: <9412050259.AA26790@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <QuZukKjqROG3075yn@skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-05 02:59:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 4 Dec 94 18:59:56 PST

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 94 18:59:56 PST
To: skaplin@skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Subject: Re: Well now that we're signing...
In-Reply-To: <QuZukKjqROG3075yn@skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <9412050259.AA26790@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Well folks, now that more people are signing messages, how about every once
> and a while posting your key? It's kind of a drag having to hit the
> keyservers.

i disagree.  thats exactly what the keyservers are for!  there is
absolutely no reason to flood mailboxes with your key, especially
when anyone who is really interested in verifying your signature 
can get your get from the keyserver _once_, which is all that is
necessary.

if i already have your key, i dont _want_ to see it again!

-derek





Thread