1994-12-21 - Re: Guerrilla remailers revisited

Header Data

From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 30af49462e308effc43eeb554feee664283a297b611b926775de67ee29061179
Message ID: <199412210509.VAA03004@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: <1NpzkKjqR4IK075yn@skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-21 05:10:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Dec 94 21:10:59 PST

Raw message

From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 94 21:10:59 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Guerrilla remailers revisited
In-Reply-To: <1NpzkKjqR4IK075yn@skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <199412210509.VAA03004@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

skaplin@skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin) writes:

>As we have found out, the freenets use an interface called "FREEPORT." To
>myself and many others this software is a mystery. I am wondering if it is
>possible to call procmail via a .forward file under Freeport. If this is
>possible, why couldn't someone write a .procmailrc file to sanitize the
>headers. If this was written properly, all you should have to do is drop
>procmail, the .procmailrc file and the .forward file in place and the
>remailer is up and running.

I tried out a freenet system once.  You could not create files with
arbitrary contents.  There was a facility for setting up mail forwarding,
but it was all done via a menu-driven system where you specified the
email address to which your mail should be forwarded.  The system really
did not seem to have enough flexibility for procmail.

Hal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQBVAwUBLve4WRnMLJtOy9MBAQH7KwIAw0ttRN3/AJRtIhAnPrt88XF6qtlx5kBR
iORzonUhCe4tvSpLaOv6AREUiVJLkerFn3KWUHgXZ+IVAS9LSPUy8g==
=NCgJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread