1994-12-04 - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 36a944c246b93788be13522a364c8c44447377a1fcd0bd5f167440160ab6446b
Message ID: <199412041552.HAA18636@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <ab06b21d010210040d3d@[132.162.201.201]>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-04 14:53:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 4 Dec 94 06:53:52 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 94 06:53:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta
In-Reply-To: <ab06b21d010210040d3d@[132.162.201.201]>
Message-ID: <199412041552.HAA18636@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

   The current digi-cash software, as I understand it, would work
   find in a real-cash situation.  You would just need to pay for your ecash.

"Just"?  That's where _most_ of the problem is.

Eric

Thread

• Return to December 1994

• Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”

• Return to “jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)”

• 1994-12-03 (Sat, 3 Dec 94 15:39:49 PST) - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta - jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
  • 1994-12-04 (Sun, 4 Dec 94 06:53:52 PST) - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)