1994-12-18 - Re: FV & PGP (was Re: First Virtual email security)

Header Data

From: NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 36fdde0f9cf14f5c69decb716c1ea6135ad4b61716705ea26649108b2d6b9bff
Message ID: <199412180718.CAA07031@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-18 07:13:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Dec 94 23:13:18 PST

Raw message

From: NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 94 23:13:18 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FV & PGP (was Re: First Virtual email security)
Message-ID: <199412180718.CAA07031@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Sat, 17 Dec 1994 nsb@nsb.fv.com wrote:

> Once more, with feeling:
> 
> It is NOT an either/or.  In the First Virtual system, the credit card
> number NEVER GOES OVER THE NET AT ALL, which means that it doesn't go
> over the net in the clear AND it doesn't go over the net encrypted.  
> 

I got your point from your first response.  The remaining 5 were not
necessary.  I do not continue to question this point.

But I might point out that companys doing business on the net might not
like having the details of their day to day transactions sniffable, as you
can build quite a good business intelligence profile from that type of
info.  As can the IRS, FBI, etc.  Nor would they appreciate being spoofed...

I strongly suggest you take another serious consideration of implementing
encryption *now* rather than later, as your current scheme is not
thorughly protecting the privacy of individuals or organizations until you
do. 

- -NetSurfer

#include <standard.disclaimer>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
==  =     = |James D. Wilson        |V.PGP 2.7:   512/E12FCD 1994/03/17 >
 "  "  o  " |P. O. Box 15432        |     finger for full PGP key        >
 "  " / \ " |Honolulu, HI  96830    |====================================>
\"  "/ G \" |Serendipitous Solutions|    Also NetSurfer@sersol.com      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLvPiKioZzwIn1bdtAQEBVAGAhjULtzChTtOy5zY0L+kjuzzXXNLfeYAL
jJqKiETK5l8GqqGPXr/I+yx3z7PSu3zN
=bcUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread