From: witter@utdallas.edu
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 3a4f55c1b66380dee589b0072ee56d7018625fb0dbcc825ea2141148f3cce25d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941229135316.26548A-100000@infoserv.utdallas.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941229092448.24591C-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-29 20:03:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Dec 94 12:03:48 PST
From: witter@utdallas.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 94 12:03:48 PST
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: HACK ATTACK
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941229092448.24591C-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941229135316.26548A-100000@infoserv.utdallas.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 29 Dec 1994, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
> Was I the only one who saw ``Hack Attack'' on the Discovery
> Channel? The promos were typically sensationalistic. `In cyber-
> space, there is no privacy.' `Teenage hackers can read, change
> or destroy your computer files.' `No one is safe.' Yada, yada,
> yada.
I had to tape it, but yeah, I saw it. Seemed a bit retro-War Games type
documentary to me also...
> They did do a fair job of defining and distinguishing the terms:
> `hacker,' `phreaker' and `cracker.' However, I don't recall ANY
> mention of encryption as a means of protecting privacy.
I also noticed that their re-enactor was wearing surgical gloves...?
Seems a little strage since they supposed he was a teenager at home. Then
again, perhaps he knows something about privacy that we do not? (I knew
someone was rating out on me, never guessed it was my keyboard...)
Also, in one of the re-enactment he states," I'm in! I control the
horizontal and the vertical..." yeah buddy, well I've got the brightness
and contrast too...sheesh!
Perhaps The Dicovery Channel would like to know about encryption, etc.
They listed their addres as:
pheedback@discovery.com
[No signature, but here's my photo..]
.........
. ''''' .
. O O .
. u .
. \_/ .
.........
Return to December 1994
Return to “witter@utdallas.edu”