From: owner-cypherpunks@hks.net
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3b45b1eb2f5237248e5a92237e8f0b1c081392f5df72cd7cc5df424094ea801b
Message ID: <199412021930.OAA16477@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-02 19:25:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:25:42 PST
From: owner-cypherpunks@hks.net
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:25:42 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ECO_do
Message-ID: <199412021930.OAA16477@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.941202132305.8537A-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>,
cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu> wrote:
>From the messages appearing on the list it would seem that
>responding to messages sent via Masco's auto-signer needs to be done
>carefully, apparently the less-than-less diligent will just respond to the
>From: address instead of to the automagical response demon at
>jya@pipeline.com
No longer. I removed this last night, since MUAs don't agree on what
they do with "Reply-To:".
(The behavior I was trying to encourage is that of following up only to
the list. Netcom lossage notwithstanding, I hate being CC'd on things
that I'll see anyway.)
- --
Todd Masco | "Roam home to a dome, Where Georgian and Gothic once stood
cactus@hks.net | Now chemical bonds alone guard our blond(e)s,
cactus@bb.com | And even the plumbing looks good." - B Fuller
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBFAwUBLt91wioZzwIn1bdtAQE2CgF9Ex2jZda0xWQmUTd/I6S6H4CoE2ONRIf3
aifw1/ILoDc1QiBkExsW+YwCD8i7dXry
=tiNs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.
A valid signature means only that it has been received at
the address belonging to the signature and forwarded.]
Return to December 1994
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@hks.net”
1994-12-02 (Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:25:42 PST) - Re: ECO_do - owner-cypherpunks@hks.net