1994-12-19 - Re: List of reliable remailers

Header Data

From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
To: Raph Levien <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3e3cbb9349bbc558e20cabff1e6245123d31085bdf0fa9ca7e641ba88cf19552
Message ID: <ab1b9804040210048e31@[132.162.201.201]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-19 20:04:46 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Dec 94 12:04:46 PST

Raw message

From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 94 12:04:46 PST
To: Raph Levien <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: List of reliable remailers
Message-ID: <ab1b9804040210048e31@[132.162.201.201]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 9:50 AM 12/19/94, Raph Levien wrote:
>   eric
>          A variant of the cpunk style. Uses Anon-Send-To: instead.

Question:
Are there in fact any remailers out there that _don't_ take
Request-Remailing-To:, but only Anon-Send-To:? That is, are there in fact
any "eric" remailers, according to Raph's criteria?

I've used at least one of the remailers that's labled as "eric" on Raph's
list, and used "Request-Remailing-To:" with it, and been succesful.  I'm
wondering if this is the case for all of them.







Thread