From: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 11:06:07 PST
To: avi@clas.ufl.edu (Avi Harris Baumstein)
Subject: Re: the netscape/ssl controversy
In-Reply-To: <199412131448.JAA07613@cutter.clas.ufl.edu>
Message-ID: <199412131904.LAA25368@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Avi Harris Baumstein writes
> netscape has a proposal that secures the *transport* of files. pgp and
> the like secure the actual files themselves. the question that will
> have to be answered is "which method of security is more valuable to
> the internet as a whole?"

No.

Both methods are valuable.

Netscape has provided a screwdriver.  People are screaming at
them for not producing a hammer.  They are planning the hammer
later.

We do not have to choose.  The more tools, the better.

The correct response is "Thanks, but what we really want
is a hammer."

Not "You stupid assholes, if you had the brains of a
turnip you would know that a screwdriver is THE WRONG
TOOL AND THE RIGHT TOOL IS A HAMMER, YOU HALF WITTED
MORONS."



-- 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our
property, because of the kind of animals that we        James A. Donald
are.  True law derives from this right, not from
the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.            jamesd@netcom.com