1994-12-30 - Re: Morality masks technical ignorance

Header Data

From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 51f7746c4f9117ba4d1b615999d4646eacbd345e1c0f983bd36eaba88a7a64cf
Message ID: <941230.011239.2D4.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <199412300642.WAA27643@deepthought.pylon.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-30 16:24:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 30 Dec 94 08:24:17 PST

Raw message

From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 94 08:24:17 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Morality masks technical ignorance
In-Reply-To: <199412300642.WAA27643@deepthought.pylon.com>
Message-ID: <941230.011239.2D4.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, blancw@pylon.com writes:

> 
> Responding to msg by Adam Shostack ( when bad things happen to 
> good crypto):
> 
>         The technical reason to oppose GAK is that it adds points of  
> failure to a crypto system which need not be there.

[...]

> And if there were no points of failure added by it, would you 
> approve, agree, to its mandatory requirement?

Sorry, blanc, but the very existance of GAK is a point of failure.
- -- 
       Roy M. Silvernail         [ ]  roy@cybrspc.mn.org
                    PGP public key available by mail
     echo /get /pub/pubkey.asc | mail file-request@cybrspc.mn.org
         These are, of course, my opinions (and my machines)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1

iQCVAwUBLwOzQxvikii9febJAQH0XgQAnL/dMtrIgu7L1dgjswOD4LZH6yZHkZ0x
V4ZFlm9oCCc089p6XaQgaOZTcBSfKiTlVHq4BXV2EWpm6ULX77rvn1cHSbmOdpvc
hjFc8bbPg586if+oGRCNXs2yO5s+KQygQh72w9D3zCVDMaFaJzCZqoa9WmMT6HmM
YsJJz5ytGCY=
=rlpe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread