1994-12-27 - Re: Moving from 1024-bit -> 2048-bit key.

Header Data

From: bryce@cybernet.co.nz (Bryce Boland)
To: an169306@anon.penet.fi
Message Hash: 53ee099354e8fc93d7c0e6c51920254a350bc528ace6972619c033efc05c5dfd
Message ID: <m0rMNio-0006jPC@mserve>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-27 03:15:42 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 26 Dec 94 19:15:42 PST

Raw message

From: bryce@cybernet.co.nz (Bryce Boland)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 94 19:15:42 PST
To: an169306@anon.penet.fi
Subject: Re: Moving from 1024-bit -> 2048-bit key.
Message-ID: <m0rMNio-0006jPC@mserve>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Just remember (so your web of trust stays intact) to sign your new key
>and use your new key to sign your old one before revoking the old key.
>This confirms that it IS a new key, rather than someone trying to
>spoof you.  

You would want to sign your new key with your old key wouldn't you? Anyone 
can add a signature to your old key, but only you can add your (old key's) 
signature to a new key. I agree that signing your old key with your new key 
is probably a good idea, as it shows that the owners of the key (the same 
person) trust that the keys belong to who they say they are.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bryce Boland <bryce@cybernet.co.nz>                   Finger for PGP Public Key
http://cybernet.co.nz/home/bryce/www/home.html






Thread