From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Message Hash: 5ecba2ea8833445d80c1c69ee9e89a8305cd69c0186a20b7dcfcf71e903f1f55
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941220173038.654B-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <9412202044.AA03402@ch1d157nwk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-20 22:44:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Dec 94 14:44:57 PST
From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 94 14:44:57 PST
To: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Subject: Re: c'punks top 5
In-Reply-To: <9412202044.AA03402@ch1d157nwk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941220173038.654B-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I would think that running an anonymous HTTP proxy server is much less likely
> to bring people screaming to your sysadmin than an anonymous remailer. Thus
> there is a chance that there could be more people willing to put up the
> service than even remailers... However, while there may be less chance of
> forceful shutdown due to complaints, an anon-http proxy server would probably
> consume much more in the way of network resources than a remailer, which will
> likely lead to many being shutdown once discovered by the sysadmins
> (although, maybe not).
On this site, I know that running one would get it killed, me a stern
warning, and if I did it again, my account removed. My goal here is
*NOT* to piss admins off - and what good are anon-HTTPD's if they're
being killed every 10 minutes. What is needed is someone who will offer
up their box, that they own or directly control, for this purpose.
-jon
( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4 5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )
( home page: http://hyperreal.com/~entropy/ ]-------[ Key-ID: 4082CCB5 )
Return to December 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”