From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 61ebc0222f113e726bae25c7d187a077d5fc69098afa1965027696fb8d0d6fa2
Message ID: <199412181603.LAA25292@pipe1.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-18 16:04:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 Dec 94 08:04:40 PST
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 94 08:04:40 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: NYT on Pentium
Message-ID: <199412181603.LAA25292@pipe1.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Markoff writes today on Intel's mishandling of the Pentium
flaw. Mr. T May quoted.
For email copy send blank message with subject: 585_999
Here are few excerpts:
In recent weeks, evoking memories of Richard Nixon at the
height of the Watergate crisis, Mr. Grove has retreated to
his "war room" inside the company's corporate headquarters
in Santa Clara.
***
'Righteousness'
How did a sporadic arithmetic error that was not detected
for months, in the chip that Intel insists is its most
heavily tested microprocessor in history, become the heart
of such a debacle?
The answer is rooted in Intel's distinctive corporate
culture, and suggests that Intel went wrong in much the
same way as other big and unresponsive companies before it.
Intel has traditionally valued engineering over product
marketing. Inward-looking and wary of competitors (from
experience with the Japanese), it developed a bunker
mentality, a go-for-the-jugular attitude and a reputation
for arrogance.
"There are certain elements in Intel's culture, and one is
righteousness," said Federico Faggin, a former Intel
engineer and co-inventor of its first microprocessor.
"The attitude at Intel is, 'We're better than everyone else
and what we do is right and we never make mistakes.' "
***
But the technologist's mind-set did little to prepare Intel
for the consumer marketplace. Although it spent hundreds of
millions of dollars on its "Intel Inside" and Pentium ad
campaigns, the consumer-oriented strategy unraveled last
month when Mr. Grove dismissed customers' requests for
chips to replace the Pentium.
***
"What Intel clearly should have done is issued a bug report
as soon as they found out it was a reproducible problem,"
said Timothy May, a former Intel semiconductor engineer.
"Instead, by keeping it mum, they backed themselves into a
corner."
But although he has issued a public apology for the flaw,
Mr. Grove has been unwilling to personally come forward in
an effort to restore customer confidence.
"The test of a great company is in how they handle
disasters," said James F. Moore, head of Geopartners, a
high-tech consulting firm. "This is one where you can't
behave like a paranoid. This is one where only the
compassionate survive."
Return to December 1994
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1994-12-18 (Sun, 18 Dec 94 08:04:40 PST) - NYT on Pentium - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>