From: TheElusiveMatthew <matthewn@uiuc.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 63c5660cf67d4a73851374a112024794e54b74a4fe18f98217da280ba570b3eb
Message ID: <Pine.DYN.3.91.941229124253.6880A-100000@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-29 18:44:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Dec 94 10:44:48 PST
From: TheElusiveMatthew <matthewn@uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 94 10:44:48 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Breaking into girlfriend's files
Message-ID: <Pine.DYN.3.91.941229124253.6880A-100000@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sorry to mail this twice, but I realized I munged the attributions, and
wanted to get it right.
Ken Arromdee wrote:
> Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> > Person A requests information.
> > Person B says no, because the use of the information is unsound in
> > person B's view.
> > Censorship? You tell me.
>
> Not unless person B is trying to force other people not to give out the
> information. Failure to release the information himself is not censorship;
> it doesn't matter what his reasons for doing so are.
Person A requests information from Group C.
Person B is a member of Group C.
Person B does not ignore Person A.
Person B does not speak with Person A.
Person B responds to Person A by addressing Group C.
Why?
If the last sentence I quoted is true, then why tell _us_ why he won't
release the information?
TheElusiveMatthew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQBFAgUBLwMDqIfkdnX+hcrBAQG5gwGAmsK9B5hFkxrre8bvaMEl428irlLSHFZf
zXocaI55xpr4ZvImCPpI/BNpKhUI0o6f
=sBQJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1994
Return to “TheElusiveMatthew <matthewn@uiuc.edu>”
1994-12-29 (Thu, 29 Dec 94 10:44:48 PST) - Re: Breaking into girlfriend’s files - TheElusiveMatthew <matthewn@uiuc.edu>