From: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Message Hash: 67ff56fb48ed27527887436a0b27cd322a17fd390f2a75b7f52b983d3733311b
Message ID: <9412152217.AA03954@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-15 22:17:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 14:17:11 PST
From: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 14:17:11 PST
To: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Subject: Re: properties of FV
Message-ID: <9412152217.AA03954@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This goes back to the two kinds of anonymity that you so usefully
> defined in your earlier message. These small transactions would
> have counterparty anonymity -- all that the seller knows is your
> first virtual id, which is essentially a user-chosen pseudonym --
> but not issuer anonymity.
That would make this counterparty pseudonymity, not anonymity. The merchant,
while not knowing the true identity of his clients, is still able to
correlate the transactions of individual accounts (and must be able to under
FV's policies). A malicious merchant, for instance, could recognize that a
particular account is more interested in certain types of information and
charge accordingly.
andrew
Return to December 1994
Return to “Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
1994-12-15 (Thu, 15 Dec 94 14:17:11 PST) - Re: properties of FV - Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>