1994-12-13 - Re: the netscape/ssl controversy

Header Data

From: marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen) (by way of marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6e9438761a81bdbb609305d2eea4309b87844756ce47f478fe4501e35b5285f7
Message ID: <199412132050.MAA28636@neon.mcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 20:49:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 12:49:48 PST

Raw message

From: marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen) (by way of marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen))
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 12:49:48 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: the netscape/ssl controversy
Message-ID: <199412132050.MAA28636@neon.mcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199412131448.JAA07613@cutter.clas.ufl.edu>, avi@clas.ufl.edu (Avi Harris Baumstein) wrote:

> so while ssl may well be a wonderful protocol, it does not address the
> problems that many cypherpunks see as being real. i think it would do
> netscape good to listen to and consider the views of many on this
> list, as they have many genuinely good ideas

Yup, we are absolutely doing so.  We do not and have not assumed
that SSL is *the* answer to everything, and we will be doing a lot
more work over the next year and beyond to tackle many of these other problems.
We're listening to everyone, and we love constructive suggestions
and feedback.

Cheers,
Marc

-- 
Marc Andreessen
Netscape Communications Corp.
Mountain View, CA
marca@mcom.com





Thread