1994-12-13 - Re: Clarification of my remarks about Netscape

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 710815135972842c620e15ba85e6dcd9314cb139247164794f85fea84a1700c5
Message ID: <199412130318.TAA00912@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <9412121737.ZM17867@warp.mcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 02:20:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 18:20:15 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 18:20:15 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Clarification of my remarks about Netscape
In-Reply-To: <9412121737.ZM17867@warp.mcom.com>
Message-ID: <199412130318.TAA00912@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>

   If this hadn't been made clear already, then hopefully this will:

	   Our intention is to support any development effort attempting
	   to implement an SSL conformant implementation. We will work with
	   you to repair the spec as needed to eliminate any errors or
	   ommisions, and help you test your implementation to ensure that
	   it interoperates with ours.

It's clear to me.  "We're going to use some security, as long as it's
called SSL and our authorship is on the document."

Eric





Thread