1994-12-01 - Re: Mandatory sig workaround

Header Data

From: turcotte@io.com (Brett Turcotte)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 73e6b406638c6f5d17aa02ca907ed479271fedbc2c30049a770c13fd2756e750
Message ID: <199412010203.UAA29036@pentagon.io.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-01 02:03:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 18:03:27 PST

Raw message

From: turcotte@io.com (Brett Turcotte)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 18:03:27 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Mandatory sig workaround
Message-ID: <199412010203.UAA29036@pentagon.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>   From: Bob Snyder <snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>
>
>   I don't sign/encrypt to
>   mailing list as many people get disgruntled by it and can cause
>   problems of it's own.
>
>Now encryption I can see disgruntlement at but a cleartext signature?

Haven't been living in the BBS world much lately have you?  There was a monster
debate recently on Fidonet's Encryption Forum and some folks from Net 106
(Houston, TX, if I recall correctly) with some sysops in that region 
claiming that the signature was encryption and who were therefore bouncing 
things because they didn't want encrypted things on their boards.

Sigh....out in the world some *serious* education is needed.

Brett Turcotte.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBLt0tCOZ0KZVyrk5FAQFoHAQAp/tXplm+LimcoToFUD6HOSGCpd322Tw5
VxKr141BvzmTKfvFBoElnHckN8IXPkvapMsvyJel49V+q7caf687TfgUKq4uA3+K
LzPQ0nAij5rd9NBR2yu3755jLYYpU/I27g8w122Ob7uxqP/ygPwHyIKMe/rl89Wc
ZzselV0J1rE=
=JwEI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  






Thread