From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 7604e677134193832bf2eb771835612db84177d2f62c66b3b1ca5efc70d2100c
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.90.941216030524.22552D-100000@use.usit.net>
Reply To: <199412160654.WAA02983@netcom15.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-16 08:17:03 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Dec 94 00:17:03 PST
From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 94 00:17:03 PST
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Tim May the Luddite--His Last Message for A While
In-Reply-To: <199412160654.WAA02983@netcom15.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.90.941216030524.22552D-100000@use.usit.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
FWIW, here's to you, Tim, from another Luddite:
I learn and use new tools to the extent I think they make my
life better. ASCII still looks good to me.
Signal-to-noise ratio on this list has fallen to zero.
Arrogance-to-signal ratio is near infinite.
Brad
On Thu, 15 Dec 1994, Timothy C. May wrote:
>
> It may be time for me to move on. More than 2 years on this list,
> since the B.C. period, may be too long.
>
> I'm fed up with fighting these battles, and no doubt many of you are
> fed up with seeing contentious pitched battles. Cypherpunks is
> increasingly a forum of strutting and posturing about who has the most
> powerful tools, who is spending more of their lives staying at the
> bleeding edge of technology. Depressing.
>
> The consensus of the active posters in this latest thread (Perry,
> Amanda, Lucky, Jim, others) is that I am a hopeless fuddy-duddy,
> unwilling to begin posting in the latest modality.
>
> (Funny, Netnews is still 99.999983% plain ASCII, by message count, and
> nobody advocating a more advanced scheme is actually _using_ such ne
> plus ultra formats here on this list. If it's so easy, and so 'punkly
> correct, why not?)
>
> Jim McCoy wrote:
>
> > If you are truly interested in making strong encryption easy and
> > transparent to the vast majority of the users of future communications
> > systems you should be leading the MIME charge, not holding everyone back...
>
> I don't care for this imputation that my views on communicating with
> the list are somehow holding others back. Or that discussing these
> issues is inconsistent with being "truly interested in making strong
> encryption easy and transparent."
>
> Bluntly, I'm fucking sick and tired of these cheap shots and personal
> innuendos. Maybe it's the "young guns" syndrome, with a codger like me
> whose first Net account was in 1972 being a ripe target for the newest
> pistoleros with their .486-caliber Linux boxes in their holsters.
>
> Whatever, I'm fed up.
>
> I'm taking a break and unsubbing for a while. If I'm back in time for
> the January meeting, we'll have the "Demo Day" as planned. If not,
> you'll have to play it by ear.
>
> As they say, you know what a Cypherpunks firing squad is?
>
> A circle.
>
>
> --Tim May
>
>
> --
> ..........................................................................
> Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
> tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
> 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
> W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments.
> Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
> Cypherpunks list: majordomo@toad.com with body message of only:
> subscribe cypherpunks. FAQ available at ftp.netcom.com in pub/tc/tcmay
>
>
>
Return to December 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”