1994-12-13 - Re: Clarification of my remarks about Netscape

Header Data

From: marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen) (by way of marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7967be32f77d88e36fa44545aa2a3caa29012dc8c252c7ece5f80ca693db9c92
Message ID: <199412130858.IAA10735@neon.mcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 08:58:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 00:58:01 PST

Raw message

From: marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen) (by way of marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreessen))
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 00:58:01 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Clarification of my remarks about Netscape
Message-ID: <199412130858.IAA10735@neon.mcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <9412121811.AA55359@amanda.dial.intercon.com>, amanda@intercon.com (Amanda Walker) wrote:

> > As for the IETF standards process, we are pushing the
> > document into the RFC process.
> 
> Precisely.  Rather than working with others in the industry and research 
> communities, you are trying to push your proposal into the standards track.

Amanda, we're not trying to push anything into the standards track.
We're publishing SSL as an informational RFC, and we have separately
submitted SSL as a proposal to the W3O working group on security
(in parallel with SHTTP and a handful of other proposals).  Nothing
is being pushed into the standards track.

We are trying to work with others in the industry and research communities,
via the above actions, by publishing SSL on our server, by participating
in this forum and others, etc., and we are generally succeeding, judging
from the overall high level of feedback we're getting from people genuinely
interesting in discussing the issues.

Marc

-- 
Marc Andreessen
Netscape Communications Corp.
Mountain View, CA
marca@mcom.com





Thread