From: “Ian Farquhar” <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7e4993c82ce2aa03ddd63005623aeb1163c2acf2b930563ac4bf4c54a2506ac3
Message ID: <9412200958.ZM12538@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
Reply To: <gate.q6FmXc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-19 23:12:57 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Dec 94 15:12:57 PST
From: "Ian Farquhar" <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 94 15:12:57 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NSA's text search algorithm
In-Reply-To: <gate.q6FmXc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <9412200958.ZM12538@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Dec 20, 2:33am, rishab@dxm.ernet.in wrote:
> Subject: NSA's text search algorithm
> "Ian Farquhar" <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>:
> > I always imagined that the development of [NSA's text scanning]
> > algorithm itself predated email, and started back with cable and
> > telex traffic.
>
> Stat text scanning is ancient, but has probably not been used on the scale
> and efficiency that the NSA would require for net traffic.
>
> > > Earlier this year, the agency began soliciting collaborations from
> > > business to develop commercial applications of their technique.
> >
> > Has anyone got any further information about how this algorithm works?
> > It sounds like Rishab has somewhat better info than was publicly
> If you read NSA's note carefully, you easily rule out
> NLP ("independent of...language") and sophisticated neural nets ("very
fast").
You can rule out both of them on the grounds that the original release
claimed that it was ammendable to hardware implementation. I speculated
some clever form of CAM plus stats engine.
Ian.
Return to December 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in”