1994-12-17 - Re: FV & PGP (was Re: First Virtual email security)

Header Data

From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 806e3c23eb069260a0eeb515e3d63a05127aaf8376c72bf10a2dc252df973870
Message ID: <199412171450.JAA28435@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-17 14:45:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Dec 94 06:45:52 PST

Raw message

From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 94 06:45:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FV & PGP (was Re: First Virtual email security)
Message-ID: <199412171450.JAA28435@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Excerpts from fv: 16-Dec-94 Re: FV & PGP (was Re: First.. Mike
Ellsworth@firewall. (1283*)

> >Without cryptography how exactly are you going to protect my credit card
> >numbers from sniffer-snoopers and crackers?  Either you will send the
> >credit card text in the clear, or it will be encrypted somehow.  Or perhaps
> >you will have customers call you over the phone to give you their credit
> >card info?  

> I would also like to be convinced on this point.  It seems that it's an
> either/or.  Either the info is in the clear, and thus vulnerable, or it's
> encrypted, and safer.

Once more, with feeling:

It is NOT an either/or.  In the First Virtual system, the credit card
number NEVER GOES OVER THE NET AT ALL, which means that it doesn't go
over the net in the clear AND it doesn't go over the net encrypted.  

Please check out info@fv.com or URL http://www.fv.com for more
information.  -- Nathaniel
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLvL6qyoZzwIn1bdtAQHSsgGAnwFwtMriI+Ln2qOBGGj6qaOW8e9hdodB
fR+SE5cjajZxS4n3QVS5gbI6R6KZkqu5
=KQOY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread