1994-12-18 - Re: Automated Witchhunt: I’ve been slandered by a script.

Header Data

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Message Hash: 83dc7835ec3ad87df0f66a1e0b8e5afa379bc7d1d945aca2c5df8d37f97b460b
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941218100656.9467B-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941218033513.23234C-100000@access3.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-18 15:21:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 Dec 94 07:21:07 PST

Raw message

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 94 07:21:07 PST
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Automated Witchhunt: I've been slandered by a script.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941218033513.23234C-100000@access3.digex.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941218100656.9467B-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Obviously, I did not post the portion claiming to be an "automated 
> message" and a warning to whomever will listen.  Yet, the post claims to 
> be from me.

   I have recieved a pair of similar messages; I found it quite 
irritating.  The message is apparently from rcalasso@netcom.com, with 
pointers to ghoast@gnu.ai.mit.edu.  

> Does this disturb anyone besides me?

   Yes.  It irritates the shit out of me, to put it bluntly.  I didn't 
post anything remotely insecure, but how am I to know that my admins will 
even read the text of my message?  I don't want my account-space 
searched, even though I'm not worried about anything being found - it's a 
matter of principle.  

> very interested in talking to the individual/s responsible.

   Addresses are above.  

-jon
( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4  5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )





Thread