From: “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97828719c309937cd89239fcf8458533703ea8657073ea8f4f673ebce14c6c27
Message ID: <199412120713.CAA03062@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-12 07:09:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 23:09:03 PST
From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 23:09:03 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Misunderstanding of Remail Headers
Message-ID: <199412120713.CAA03062@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hal writes:
> One thing I do notice on reading the discussion in can.politics is the
> fact that despite the disclaimers in the message headers, some people
> took this as a forgery attempt on my part. I wonder if it might be
> necessary to insert disclaimers into the body of the message as
> anon.penet.fi does, at least for messages to known mail-to-news
> gateways.
>
> There was also a misperception that my remailer was an official effort
> endorsed by Portal (again, despite the disclaimers). Note that it was
> they who were contacted, not me (yet). This might suggest that it will
> not be possible to cleanly separate the remailer operators and service
> providers when problems like this arise. Both may end up being hassled
> (time will tell whether I am).
This is all too familiar to me. Although I still haven't heard the official
line on the shutdown of Underdog following the Scythe spam, at least some
people locally (including, crucially, my advisor) received the impression that
I had forged (and authored !) the offending news articles in spite of the
disclaimer headers.
Furthermore, the spam might not have been a fatal blow if not for the fact
that some people ignored the "complaints to <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>"
header and wrote directly to root or postmaster here. Everyone who actually
wrote to me came away satisfied that I was taking appropriate action, as
far as I could tell.
I'll take this opportunity to reiterate that I'm no longer operating a
remailer at this address. I wrote to Matt Ghio about a week ago asking him
to remove my address from remailer-pings@chaos.bsu.edu, but I suppose he's
busy with school these days. That list remains frozen with information
dating from Nov.22. Karl Barrus mentioned something about chaos.bsu.edu
having moved to chaos.taylored.com; perhaps this is part of the reason for
the snag ?
- - -L. Futplex McCarthy; PGP key by finger or server "We've got computers,
we're tapping phone lines; I know that that ain't allowed" --Talking Heads
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBLuv2yGf7YYibNzjpAQF/GQP/VNo06+qqYvQBhU0xAO+TpHx44OJX6dKI
HWhW+zIA6Xp/UYKsql8Mfg7dhxesJ4JSdqkkjY8znqUrwp/CnOTo3qql0W/EOxYt
l3f7kcHJWvr/gPO/rvtMgWbR2GRjkhaCa62ny/tgV+IGCKxDqCi25A4Y2x23KFDB
JgiLP4c2hSc=
=34zm
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBLuv4ACoZzwIn1bdtAQEkZwF/dL0lroedGXvGlNJFJ5W6Z0dm83yefrzq
9aRFW9Xh+2/cjvb5+OMY0Ol1uEnU5UaM
=ygWU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1994
Return to ““L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>”
1994-12-12 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 23:09:03 PST) - Re: Misunderstanding of Remail Headers - “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>