1994-12-02 - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97f623cb857157631a0a0f3e1f4497631851459273ffe872b42199fb27157d89
Message ID: <199412020205.SAA14356@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <ab03f33308021004800c@[130.214.233.6]>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-02 01:07:08 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 17:07:08 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 17:07:08 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta
In-Reply-To: <ab03f33308021004800c@[130.214.233.6]>
Message-ID: <199412020205.SAA14356@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)

   And that rule of thumb completely ignores the fact that if a
   transaction is fouled up anywhere along the line, one finds extensive
   legal liability involved instead of a 'mere' corrupt table in a database.

When the algorithms include "Call legal dept. and sue", the ability of
most programmers to design systems goes out the window.

Jamie's estimate of the magnitude of the problem is probably
overstating the case, but not much.

Eric





Thread