From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 17:04:07 PST
To: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Subject: Re: Mighty morphing power cypherpunks
In-Reply-To: <199412022333.PAA12885@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9412030102.AA11319@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    From: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
    Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 15:33:19 -0800 (PST)
    
    Rick Busdiecker writes
    > 
    >     From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
    >     Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 19:15:35 -0800 (PST)
    >     
    >     So autonag every nym to send a public key in.
    > 
    > Where do you send the autonag message?  Do you trust the From: or
    > Reply-To: fields?
    
    It does not matter who the true identity associated with a
    public key is.  My proposal is only that signatures
    be checked for consistent identity, not true name.

Hmmm.  I thought that you had also suggesting that this mechanism
should ``autonag every nym to send a public key in'' which I thought
raised the question of ``Where do you send the autnoag messages?''

Perhaps you meant for the autonag to be a notice attached to the
distributed message?

			Rick