From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aa7bcc9d15f2c9b8c0545b148bc0da5ea22d19f0e787e8cf62bd192d83b3a84b
Message ID: <199412130353.TAA00981@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199412112248.RAA25113@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 02:55:26 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 18:55:26 PST
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 18:55:26 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Broadcasts and the Rendezvous Problem
In-Reply-To: <199412112248.RAA25113@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <199412130353.TAA00981@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>
That's not a very good approach: a human has to add a new remailer into
the "net" by adding it to the systems polled. Not only is the human
intervention a Bad Thing, but having a central registry of remailers
is bad infrastructure. A more "web-of-trust"-like mechanism is desirable.
In terms of autopinging, certainly human intervention is not desirable.
This begs one question though, namely, "how does one gain trust in a
remailer?". Certainly likelihood of service can be automated, but
other forms of trust cannot. Human intervention is necessary each
time someone begins to trust a remailer. That intervention can be for
one's own use or for someone else's, but automatically trusting new
remailers is Not Good.
The question then becomes "what is the structure of human intervention
required to change the trust in a remailer?". Use of agency will be
desirable, certainly.
These questions of human relations need to be examined before
technical means of communication can be profitably pinned down.
Eric
Return to December 1994
Return to “Pierre Uszynski <pierre@shell.portal.com>”