From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bed6726e287fd74d6d4c8452e9d4acbf66beb52df7e5e7faf8516c89fee503d0
Message ID: <v01510103ab114c09dd73@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-12 01:05:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 17:05:44 PST
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 17:05:44 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Broadcasts and the Rendezvous Problem
Message-ID: <v01510103ab114c09dd73@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim wrote:
>L. Todd Masco wrote:
>
>> Seems to me that one of the fundamental building blocks necessary to
>> a host of anonymous services is a means of rendezvousing in a manner that
>> is not vulnerable to traffic analysis.
>>
>> The obvious solution to this is through the use of a broadcast medium.
>> Has anybody created an alt.* group purely for remailer-associated
>> rendezvous?
>
>Isn't this what "alt.anonymous.messages" is all about?
>
>(It's been at my Netcom site for many months now...I don't recall who
>created it, but it seems to me it was one of us.)
Which brings us back to the news -> mail gateway. There has to be a better way.
I know that a small fraction of the net goes via satelite. Is there a way
to inject truely anonymous datagrams? Any hams out there?
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to December 1994
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1994-12-12 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 17:05:44 PST) - Re: Broadcasts and the Rendezvous Problem - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)