From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 94 09:09:42 PST
To: brands@cwi.nl
Subject: Re: ecash trial issues explained
In-Reply-To: <9412031245.AA25009=brands@zeus.cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <199412041647.AA06076@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Stefan Brands wrote:

> I have not contributed to this discussion in any way afterwards. In light of
> this, I most certainly felt unhappy with the subject of "Brands excluded from
> digicash beta" someone decided to choose; the wording "excluded" implies
> something (the deliberateness of the whole thing) which I certainly did not
> intend to imply (and do not believe).

I am at least partially responsible for this, and I apologize. It is not fair
to imply either that Digicash intentionally excluded Brands or that Brands
claimed that they had.

It looks like everyone's concerns and complaints have been addressed. Thanks
to the folks from Digicash for their work.

- -Paul

- -- 
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG       | Good software engineering doesn't reduce the 
perobich@ingr.com            | amount of work you put into a product; it just 
Not speaking for Intergraph. | redistributes it differently.
		  ### http://www.intergraph.com ###

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBLuHynKfb4pLe9tolAQE/kAQAvrJ71y/jN4FMWO8aoAkhQjP1V/6kpork
J74x85O3QvXRs1S6nsAyRGiAextT0GS7LHHyCVerh4/4Gwk6LgKk2TzaPJxp5oyU
RUTFS16ghIWGzWmjkL/MXuinRxvaN4hogIqNJ/pARbdwW6Ncm/I4VBk+WSFEM2ha
MA1UyViLFc4=
=QewS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----