From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dbd6a19817bb3c67a76ae9b0209aecea173678a9f92b4ad2262b362c109cf9df
Message ID: <941205.070835.9O5.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <sede08a1.001@aba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-05 13:40:14 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Dec 94 05:40:14 PST
From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 94 05:40:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: E-money Good or Bad?
In-Reply-To: <sede08a1.001@aba.com>
Message-ID: <941205.070835.9O5.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In list.cypherpunks, KDAGUIO@aba.com writes:
> Let me ask you a question. If people can communicate over the
> net anonymously, tranmit unreadable messages, and transfer
> unlimited amounts of fully anonymous money, haven't you, in
> addition to protecting some of the interests of minorities, also
> perfected a mechanism by which people with evil intent can engage
> in criminal activities completely unobserved and with no fear of
> prosecution?
This has been hashed almost to death before. The use of crypto does not
remove the fear of prosecution. It only makes it more difficult to
intercept messages in transit. Actions at both ends of the transaction
will still be visible to some extent.
We don't have any duty to make law enforcement's job easier, especially
at the cost of our privacy.
- --
Roy M. Silvernail [ ] roy@cybrspc.mn.org
PGP public key available by mail
echo /get /pub/pubkey.asc | mail file-request@cybrspc.mn.org
These are, of course, my opinions (and my machines)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBLuMR9hvikii9febJAQGegAP9H5iw3Gip8uxzZD0tnU0KjPfNRvxHx8VQ
JTU3PvO1EMOrSzebI6BRdhXFMEe//tAYEe51yxK5/8s1rYGEckMETigFw2Forirf
/gabSw590tFAiPd1y+l2fdishEwXx0Pc67MBj4QKwgeW40AE2/aD7RR8vHkGy4CU
60chibeOiyQ=
=ZKfb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1994
Return to “roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)”