1994-12-06 - Re: Interoperability, one-use remailer tickets

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: MIKEINGLE@delphi.com
Message Hash: df12f9113ed8b5a7bf4e9c64a3827cd6b4eaa91ff8585a8fd4ad3ec56126b931
Message ID: <9412051953.AA04836@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-06 01:00:20 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Dec 94 17:00:20 PST

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 94 17:00:20 PST
To: MIKEINGLE@delphi.com
Subject: Re:  Interoperability, one-use remailer tickets
Message-ID: <9412051953.AA04836@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mike Ingle suggests adding a one-shot reply capability to the remailers,
to discourage hit-and-run abusers by allowing replies to them.
The reply token would become invalid after either one use or timeout.
One problem with this approach is that, if the sender is on the
mailing list / newsgroup that the message is sent to,
he can use up the one-shot reply himself if he's quick,
by being the first one to reply.  It's also somewhat difficult
to design a system where the one-shot replies would chain.

Non-automatic non-mandatory one-shot replies are more useful,
since there are times you may want to get replies.

	Bill





Thread