1994-12-28 - Re: Why I have a 512 bit PGP key

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: edfd92deb60e722bdc6b02753025d6ed6549d10a9e0b92a091904de2ee086f20
Message ID: <199412280240.SAA02061@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <9412281256.ZM11042@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-28 02:41:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Dec 94 18:41:01 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 94 18:41:01 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why I have a 512 bit PGP key
In-Reply-To: <9412281256.ZM11042@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <199412280240.SAA02061@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: "Ian Farquhar" <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>

re: personal account tripwire

   The problem is that although you can protect the data file of
   hashes (by using a pass phrase to encrypt it), protecting the
   binary which does the checking is rather more difficult.

Why not recompile the binary?  All it needs to be is something like
md5.c.

Eric





Thread