From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@scruznet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f8f0ac3b433bb96bbb55d5207f5208242fe251ce828c654efbbde6b8d1fbd02f
Message ID: <Chameleon.4.01.941223150330.jcorgan@jcorgan.sj.scruznet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-23 23:03:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Dec 94 15:03:12 PST
From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@scruznet.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 94 15:03:12 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GUI: PGP vs novices
Message-ID: <Chameleon.4.01.941223150330.jcorgan@jcorgan.sj.scruznet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>There is also the problem that a number of applications (such as Internet in
>a Box) require there own Winsock to make connections to the Internet. If you
>replace the Ibox winsock with another, when you run the programs they will
>no longer call the dialer to dial into the Internet. I believe the same
>holds true for Trumpet.
I only have familiarity with the commercial Netmanage Chameleon Winsock
implementation. Someone else had let me know about this potential
difficulty. Apparently some Winsock stacks only provide a WINSOCK.DLL for
3rd party compatibility, i.e., their own applications talk to proprietary
hooks into their stack for performance or other reasons. Netmanage's products
do both; they perform their network I/O through WINSOCK.DLL, but also use
a variety of shared library functions supplied with the rest of the stack. In
this case, my WINSOCK.DLL shim works fine. Remember, I'm not replacing a
given implementation's DLL, just intercepting and passing through calls to
it. So as long as a mail application uses exclusively standards based
Windows Sockets API calls _to perform network I/O_, my product should work.
YMMV, of course :)
=======================================================================
Johnathan Corgan "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent"
jcorgan@netcom.com -Isaac Asimov
PGP Public Key: http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html
Or send email to: pgp-public-keys@pgp.ai.mit.edu Subj: GET jcorgan
=======================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBLvtW4k1Diok8GKihAQEjngP7BRUatySeVmJ2SvDLycMYtCTh5obyvAZ4
nLxhP69VUCs1LprfMVWIsL46WsS/neiVpf3Wor0T/kzLrb0s/0m3a8+GQhdz7te9
NRQbJGfJG57KR1yCBHMk2/HSDjVR0daCQVQCcJFTqw2aOXfWo6x20ZZqQvR1N2Ju
U57UIG9BRG4=
=Xm6z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1994
Return to “Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@scruznet.com>”
1994-12-23 (Fri, 23 Dec 94 15:03:12 PST) - Re: GUI: PGP vs novices - Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@scruznet.com>