(Unknown Date) - No Subject

Header Data

From: Anonymous
To: N/A
Message Hash: 1d90e2c8c9ada0e83bd030adffd55857255fc50c611c16af50b7498cbc3c95f8
Message ID: <7f123bca9c99147d74bf41762653bb0d@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: (Unknown Date)
Raw Date: N/A

Raw message

From: Anonymous
Date: Tue Sep 07 12:45:37 1999
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <7f123bca9c99147d74bf41762653bb0d@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I read this paper some time ago.  Couldn't the cash still be detected as
having belonged to the original owner even after you have transferred it?
If so, then the other requirement is that you must transfer it anonymously,
otherwise they can still get back to you.

An example would be if you are doing something which the government doesn't
like, such as shipping tracts advocating egalitarianism to a country with
explicitly racist policies.  The government might be able to put pressure
on some members of the organization and use this (in effect) "marked money"
to find the others.  If you pass the money on to someone else, but they
know it came from you, and then the government comes to them, determines
that this is "dirty money" (which was given to the threatening egalitarians)
they can say "who did you get this from" and your jig is up.

Hal






Thread