From: doumakes@netcom.com (Don Doumakes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 157d762722edc894dfafa179072e825782da04381e02c41fb72b322488db3caa
Message ID: <199501270505.VAA13738@netcom16.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-27 05:07:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 21:07:00 PST
From: doumakes@netcom.com (Don Doumakes)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 21:07:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: LOCKSMITH'S GUILD WANTS L
Message-ID: <199501270505.VAA13738@netcom16.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com> wrote:
> This assumes that governments have the necessary wisdom to tell a bad
> architect from a good architect. This does not seem very plausible.
>
> [snip]
>
> While universities often issue or refrain from issuing certificates for
> corrupt and improper reasons, government supervision on this matter is
> unlikely to keep them honest
I think you misunderstand the licensing process. The standards for a
profession are set by the profession itself. They decide what is an
adequate curriculum, for example, and what is an adequate amount of
continuing education. They literally write the questions for the
licensing exam.
They also privately accredit the schools, which is more than adequate to
"keep them honest."
Then the government administers the exam and issues licenses. The
professional associations could do this themselves, making it an
entirely private affair, but there remains one function that only
government can exert: the government forbids someone without a license
from functioning as a professional.
In other words, licensing isn't a process of government interference in
professions. It's a process of professions seeking governmental
imprimateur for their own credentialing process, arguably in the public
interest.
(YMMV; there may be exceptional professions that just hated the whole
idea and were dragged into it kicking and screaming, of which I am
unaware.)
ObCrypto: It's certainly true that crypto will make it easier to
function as a professional without having the credentials. "On the
Internet, nobody knows you're a quack." I just see it as something to
endure, rather than something to applaud.
______________________________________________________________________
Don Doumakes Finger doumakes@netcom.com for PGP public key
Foxpro databases built to your specifications. Email me for details.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBLygTahtumcu2AjihAQEb7AP8DRfcZJvLZy8mw7jg6wjrjHeNl1IbP5EW
h3en/84ENKB2SbmcIXx7TtEl3jGz6bZ2T7JA7Ed3UYC78lq8/QsTgBW41Sh+arbX
/j1o6Sot6jYAs5EGiuiD4OoxhRopDMuoZFt9NyRJfTF68jHP1olsjiLwnV0mq3g4
nRUh71wnFmk=
=EjEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1995
Return to “rarachel@prism.poly.edu (Arsen Ray Arachelian)”