From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Message Hash: 171c85034b76fb793f71aacbd6656a2ccb45e869e204fa74af67795b2206b4e9
Message ID: <9501311755.AA25178@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <v03001106ab541cedd91c@[140.174.229.210]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-31 17:55:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 09:55:32 PST
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 09:55:32 PST
To: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Subject: Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
In-Reply-To: <v03001106ab541cedd91c@[140.174.229.210]>
Message-ID: <9501311755.AA25178@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Michael Sattler says:
> At 07:21 1/31/95, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >"Pat Farrell" says:
> >> Today's (1/31) Washington Post has a tiny blurb that AT&T and VLSI will
> >> announce a hardware encryption device for use in lots of
> >> communications devices, including cell phones, PDAs, etc.
> >
> >This is the device I posted a newswire article about a couple of weeks
> >ago. No details, but it looks cute.
>
> How does this device conform with the legislated requirement that it must
> deliver plaintext to the government upon court-approved demand?
There is no such requirement.
Perry
Return to January 1995
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”