From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2177a7e63e55ac267d8409a66d77a412a46bbb36b3ef7c27251adef24021cf60
Message ID: <950107.134210.3m7.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <9501071759.AA00953@anon.penet.fi>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-07 19:54:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jan 95 11:54:26 PST
From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 95 11:54:26 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: cel fraud
In-Reply-To: <9501071759.AA00953@anon.penet.fi>
Message-ID: <950107.134210.3m7.rusnews.w165w@cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In list.cypherpunks, an172607@anon.penet.fi writes:
> AT&T's Steve Fleischer, speaking to Newsbytes, said such cloning operations
> have become such a successful criminal industry that some criminals sell the
> phones with 30-day guarantees.
>
> "If a number is cut off, you can bring it back to the cellular bandits and
> have it reprogrammed for no additional charge," he explained. "It costs the
> carriers around $1 million a day."
>
> He paused, then added: "It just shows how big a demand there is for wireless
> communications."
Does anyone else think this is funny (in both senses of the word)?
The cell-phraud system shows a demand for cheap, though illegal, phone
service. The wireless aspect is pretty much incidental to the fraud
aspect, no?
- --
Roy M. Silvernail [ ] roy@cybrspc.mn.org
PGP public key available by mail
echo /get /pub/pubkey.asc | mail file-request@cybrspc.mn.org
These are, of course, my opinions (and my machines)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBLw7vEhvikii9febJAQGLlgQAiteZ/51syb6gSkiwWMLs9oQ+99hMxbps
L7rshpeQ0xDM7GN+Szz4PiQ4CQrqMlxxkvgppsrRbU2E5WPv8IGvW9pa6gWx8Y9B
H/ZwmjSz1lIMCATh5osFt9myK3nkwHasxjGYqpyJJwcbTd+rQi8/lIv1EYcxv+HX
qtiHdjrFvbE=
=D0AH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to February 1995
Return to “roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)”