From: Carol Anne Braddock <carolann@mm.com>
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2916e0a195d17d1722c951fedaf06ec40d64a1c9cfa364feec1acae890c47af4
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501070243.B14788-0100000@downburst.mm.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-07 08:15:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jan 95 00:15:04 PST
From: Carol Anne Braddock <carolann@mm.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 95 00:15:04 PST
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: The first reply came 3 days later.
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501070243.B14788-0100000@downburst.mm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
These groups are important to me. It is why I posted them there. I use
PGP extensively in my usenet postings, and I am not the only one in those
groups that posts with PGP. Yes, suffice to say, I endorse this letter.
I dream of a day when we do not have to deal with this issue, yet it is
something that affects any one who uses the program. All that was really
asked was not to go to the meeting with the D.A., and make a protest.
MOST CYPHERPUNKS I KNOW OF COULDN'T HAVE MADE IT ANYWAY, THIS TIME, BECAUSE
THE STAKES IN THE REMAILER GAME ARE HIGH, AND WITHIN A MONTH OR TWO, THERE
WILL BE SYSTEM SO THAT WE CAN GET SOME MONEY TO EAT WITH AND BUY EQUIPMENT.
But on the user level, I do my best to TEACH GOOD FUNDAMENTAL COMPUTER
SAFETY. Rumors are no good for this. There was PRZ's letter to us, and
Dubois's letter to alt.security pgp. Those are facts. Those I can teach
with, and so can even a one month PGP Cypherpunk Novice. So can you.
Now, the first reply,
Return to January 1995
Return to “Nesta Stubbs <nesta@nesta.pr.mcs.net>”