From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 29fef88defa1afa205aa10fd44626b291c4aa43ee7fd7e99b7bb1eec21045a91
Message ID: <199501131807.KAA02940@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <Pine.NXT.3.91.950112180625.3304B-100000@kisa>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-13 18:09:41 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 10:09:41 PST
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 10:09:41 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: essential characteristics of a Data Haven
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.3.91.950112180625.3304B-100000@kisa>
Message-ID: <199501131807.KAA02940@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Adam Feuer <adamfast@seanet.com>
what differentiates a "data haven" from "reasonably secure offsite
storage"?
Right now, that's easy. Data havens don't exist, and prototype code
for reasonably secure off-site storage does.
The key distinguishing feature of off-site storage is that it stores
data only as bits, structured and segmented, but not interpreted _as_
anything but bits. A data haven, on the other hand, holds things that
someone disapproves of, otherwise there's no need for a haven. _A
fortiori_, if someone disapproves of it, it must mean something. Raw
bits don't mean anything, or rather, they can mean everything.
Eric
Return to January 1995
Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”