From: Nesta Stubbs <nesta@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 3eedf6c0e2de2ff1aa0f66eff45b63b6c27378f860b8d257cad04d393d79c5b1
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501062110.C6731-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950106190639.16522B-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-07 03:32:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 19:32:02 PST
From: Nesta Stubbs <nesta@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 19:32:02 PST
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: A Fire Upon the Deep
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950106190639.16522B-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501062110.C6731-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 6 Jan 1995, Wei Dai wrote:
> In article <199501052231.OAA11745@netcom5.netcom.com>, tcmay@netcom.com
>
> There was some recent talk about network agent technology on this list.
> Vinge mentions almost in passing how an entire planet (or maybe planets)
> was taken over by an "intelligent net packet". Makes me rather nervous
> about things like Magic Cap...
>
does anynoe have any information about intelligent agents? I mean I know
about filter and stuff, but they arent intelligent agents. I assume one
would be something like the WWW worm and other searching scripts that
have a database of information to cross-reference their finds and decide
what to send back to you. the WWWWorm is a good centralized illustration
of this, with a searchable index of HTML pages. Or is there osmethign
else that makes upa "intelligent agent"
> One more thing that's marginally related to cypherpunks (hey I really
> like this book so I'll take any chance I can to talk about it ;-) is
> the idea that the efficiency of distributed computation (and distributed
> intelligence) depends on high bandwidth and low latency of the communication
> medium. Since anonymity seems to have rather high costs in terms of
> bandwidth and latency (compare anonymous e-mail with internet video
> conferencing or even with normal e-mail), this implies that
> an organization of anonymous agents will not work as efficiently as
> a similar orginzation whose members are not concerned about
> anonymity.
i disagree storngly. anonimity with almost no increase in latency or
decrease in bandwidth is easily viable. Especially if it was a group of
coleagues planning to get together, I mean the remailers and stuff are a
different thing altogehter, but ytalk or another confrencing system with
untracable features is no problem, hell just a conference call dialing up
from payphones, ora favorite hacker trick of running a conference of a
COCOT. etc....
i want to know everything http://www.mcs.com/~nesta/home.html
i want to be everywhere Nesta's Home Page
i want to fuck everyone in the world &
i want to do something that matters /-/ a s t e zine
Return to January 1995
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”