1995-01-07 - Re: A Fire Upon the Deep

Header Data

From: Nesta Stubbs <nesta@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 3eedf6c0e2de2ff1aa0f66eff45b63b6c27378f860b8d257cad04d393d79c5b1
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501062110.C6731-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950106190639.16522B-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-07 03:32:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 19:32:02 PST

Raw message

From: Nesta Stubbs <nesta@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 19:32:02 PST
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: A Fire Upon the Deep
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950106190639.16522B-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501062110.C6731-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 6 Jan 1995, Wei Dai wrote:

> In article <199501052231.OAA11745@netcom5.netcom.com>, tcmay@netcom.com 
>  
> There was some recent talk about network agent technology on this list.
> Vinge mentions almost in passing how an entire planet (or maybe planets)
> was taken over by an "intelligent net packet".  Makes me rather nervous
> about things like Magic Cap...
>
does anynoe have any information about intelligent agents?  I mean I know 
about filter and stuff, but they arent intelligent agents.  I assume one 
would be something like the WWW worm and other searching scripts that 
have a database of information to cross-reference their finds and decide 
what to send back to you.  the WWWWorm is a good centralized illustration 
of this, with a searchable index of HTML pages.  Or is there osmethign 
else that makes upa  "intelligent agent"
  
> One more thing that's marginally related to cypherpunks (hey I really
> like this book so I'll take any chance I can to talk about it ;-) is
> the idea that the efficiency of distributed computation (and distributed 
> intelligence) depends on high bandwidth and low latency of the communication
> medium.  Since anonymity seems to have rather high costs in terms of
> bandwidth and latency (compare anonymous e-mail with internet video
> conferencing or even with normal e-mail), this implies that
> an organization of anonymous agents will not work as efficiently as
> a similar orginzation whose members are not concerned about
> anonymity.

i disagree storngly.  anonimity with almost no increase in latency or 
decrease in bandwidth is easily viable.  Especially if it was a group of 
coleagues planning to get together, I mean the remailers and stuff are a 
different thing altogehter, but ytalk or another confrencing system with 
untracable features is no problem, hell just a conference call dialing up 
from payphones, ora favorite hacker trick of running a conference of a 
COCOT.  etc....

i want to know everything          http://www.mcs.com/~nesta/home.html
i want to be everywhere                     Nesta's Home Page        
i want to fuck everyone in the world               &
i want to do something that matters         /-/ a s t e zine





Thread