From: Robert Rothenberg <rrothenb@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4088e5e5bd18abb23bb53bf6811ee471f8cb8630f4a3d324db667375c4dd8231
Message ID: <9501130321.AA03497@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-13 03:21:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:21:04 PST
From: Robert Rothenberg <rrothenb@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:21:04 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: How "good" is MDC?
Message-ID: <9501130321.AA03497@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
I've been toying with a homegrown implementation of the MDC algorithm,
similar to the one used in HPack, written mostly in 386 assembler though.
My version also scrambles the constants by multiple cycles over the key,
so it should be better the vanilla MD5... I'm wondering how "secure" MDC
is, though... are there better hashing algorithms or possible modifications
that could be made?
(A silly question considering I haven't yet released the sources. When
they are ready I'll post an announcement or something.)
Rob
Return to January 1995
Return to “Robert Rothenberg <rrothenb@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>”
1995-01-13 (Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:21:04 PST) - How “good” is MDC? - Robert Rothenberg <rrothenb@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>