1995-01-30 - Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
To: Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>
Message Hash: 477d26773bf5c5151727d4dee0ed49824e69539a196220812dfbac56ebc442ec
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501291649.A14175-0100000@netcom5>
Reply To: <9501280817.AA15280@TeleCheck.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-30 00:46:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 16:46:11 PST

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 16:46:11 PST
To: Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>
Subject: Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks
In-Reply-To: <9501280817.AA15280@TeleCheck.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501291649.A14175-0100000@netcom5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 28 Jan 1995, Joe Turner wrote:
> Additionally, I don't know of too many operating 
> systems where the source code is floating around.  I mean so what if 
> it doesn't come with a pretty shrink wrapped package and a thick 
> getting-started, if you have a question just go find the source code.  
> Geez.  

There are some communities of software developers that have 
this strange belief that program behavior should conform to user
expectations instead of the user conforming to the program
behavior.


Your other remarks are rational, relevant, appropriate, and correct,
but this remark illustrates magnificently why unix is
still user hostile after all these years.


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          |  
We have the right to defend ourselves     |   http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind     |  
of animals that we are. True law          |   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the     |  
arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.  |   jamesd@netcom.com






Thread