From: Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 95 19:43:46 PST
To: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@scruznet.com>
Subject: Re: Another problem w/Data Havens...
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.4.01.950116182254.jcorgan@jcorgan.sj.scruznet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950116223900.25130A-100000@unix3.netaxs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 16 Jan 1995, Johnathan Corgan wrote:

> It just occurred to me when reading this another method for ensuring the
> "I can't tell what's in it" condition with a data haven operator.  Why not
> use a secret sharing system where the contraband data is split into a number
> of pieces and sent to different havens?

	Damn it, you beat me to it. :-)

[ ... ] 
> Ok, Eric, go ahead and blast your holes in this argument :)

	I'm not Eric, but hey.

	This entire discussion is completely unnecessary. There are ways 
of removing operator liability without examining the submission at all.

----------
	unix3.netaxs.com:/home/grendel 1/511> host bermuda-gw.alter.net
	bermuda-gw.alter.net has address 137.39.234.130
	bermuda-gw.alter.net mail is handled by relay2.UU.NET
	bermuda-gw.alter.net mail is handled by relay1.UU.NET
	unix3.netaxs.com:/home/grendel 1/512> 
----------

	Nicht wahr?

Michael