1995-01-13 - Re: Crypto functions

Header Data

From: chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
To: cactus@hks.net (L. Todd Masco)
Message Hash: 4c2ee15310f21ea4b3c0f45872b69841f5c661d97056e7b12049e03bc508a9f6
Message ID: <9501122119.AA05796@doom.intuit.com>
Reply To: <199501102139.QAA00961@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-13 03:49:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:49:56 PST

Raw message

From: chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:49:56 PST
To: cactus@hks.net (L. Todd Masco)
Subject: Re: Crypto functions
In-Reply-To: <199501102139.QAA00961@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <9501122119.AA05796@doom.intuit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> What crypto functions are considered modern and usable?  The list I have
> right now is:
> 
> RSA
> IDEA
> DES
> 3DES
> RC4
> RC5
> BLOWFISH
> MD4
> MD5
> 
> (and FLAMINGO, a trivial test case, which consists of xor'ing every 8 chars
>  with "flamingo".)
> 
> Pointers to code for any other schemes will be greatly appreciated.

You might want to include LUC, even though it is fairly new and
extremely cumbersome to implement (though, I would say, not outright
unusable).

Among symmetric ciphers, there's GOST.

And I'd count SHA as a reliable hash function.


--
Mark Chen 
chen@intuit.com
415/329-6913
finger for PGP public key
D4 99 54 2A 98 B1 48 0C  CF 95 A5 B0 6E E0 1E 1D

Thread

• Return to January 1995

• Return to “cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Gone Fission)”
• Return to “chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)”
• Return to ““Ian Farquhar” <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>”
• Return to “Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>”
• Return to ““L. Todd Masco” <cactus@hks.net>”
• Return to “Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• 1995-01-10 (Tue, 10 Jan 95 13:34:06 PST) - Crypto functions - “L. Todd Masco” <cactus@hks.net>
  • 1995-01-10 (Tue, 10 Jan 95 14:08:54 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-01-15 (Sun, 15 Jan 95 12:46:22 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
      • 1995-01-16 (Sun, 15 Jan 95 16:56:51 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - “Ian Farquhar” <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>
        • 1995-01-16 (Sun, 15 Jan 95 21:04:09 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
          • 1995-01-16 (Sun, 15 Jan 95 23:04:34 PST) - Cryptanalysis of Blowfish (Was: Re: Crypto functions) - Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
        • 1995-01-16 (Mon, 16 Jan 95 11:59:00 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Gone Fission)
  • 1995-01-13 (Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:49:56 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
    • 1995-01-13 (Thu, 12 Jan 95 21:46:02 PST) - Re: Crypto functions - “Ian Farquhar” <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>