From: Carol Anne Braddock <carolann@mm.com>
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4fb5ad2de2b551f1db3d2233eaa5c9e2462f120eec9c764629b534a8916cb4a0
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501070130.A14788-0100000@downburst.mm.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-07 07:59:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 23:59:11 PST
From: Carol Anne Braddock <carolann@mm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 23:59:11 PST
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: From me to me to you...The Actual Article
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501070130.A14788-0100000@downburst.mm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dear All of You,
This is the article, and what I did with it. It is complete in it's
entireity, from the bang paths, to the crosspostings. Please study them
carefully, for my next post will contain the first response to the article,
three days later. ALL DURING THIS TIME, I WAS LED TO BELIEVE, THROUGH PHONE
CALLS THAT THIS WAS "GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED SOON". NOTHING OF THE SORT
HAPPENED. NO ONE IN ANY OF THE TEN GROUPS RAISED A SINGLE OBJECTION. PERIOD.
I believe in your capacity to fairly judge.
My response to the first complaint lies
still censored in my mail reader.
For if .1% of all the Usenet
is inappropriate to
post to, when
will it
become
just
.01%
?
Now, the article,
Return to January 1995
Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>”